Skip to content
Declared

Public contract award · TED 773653-2025

RFT for the provision of Cyber Crime Disruption Services

Department of Social Protection awarded this contract to PFH Technology Group Limited on 21 November 2025, using an open procedure, and 3 bids were received. The notice publishes a value of €170,000. The published term is 60 months, to Nov 2030.

Award decision
Award published
Term ends

Open the official notice on TED (opens in a new tab)How to check this record

Who awarded it, and to whom

Public bodyDepartment of Social ProtectionDublin 1 · 354 published awards

How big is it?

Larger than 46% of contract awards, and number 236 of 293 from this public body.

A log scale: each step is ten times the last. “Typical” is the median contract award, €200K.

How long does it run?

A published term of 5 years, to Nov 2030.

Awarded2025-11-21Ends2030-11-21

The term is the notice’s duration counted from the award date. A contract may be extended or end early; the notices do not say.

What the notice says

Procedure
Open ProcedureAny business could bid.
Competition type
BespokeA one-off contract tendered for this purchase.
Bids received
3Bids the buyer received from businesses.
Subject (CPV)
IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support
Estimated value
€170,000What the buyer expected the contract to be worth before tendering.
Buyer town
Dublin 1
eTenders tender ID
6384494eTenders' own page for a tender needs a free supplier login, so this record links to the OGP open data on data.gov.ie instead.
TED notice
773653-2025 (opens in a new tab)Opens the official notice on TED, the EU's public tenders site.

Check it yourself

The official records this page is built from.

Cite this record

"RFT for the provision of Cyber Crime Disruption Services", contract award record on Declared (declared.ie), compiled from TED contract award notice 773653-2025. https://declared.ie/contracts/ted-773653-2025/rft-for-the-provision-of-cyber-crime-disruption-services. Data refreshed 12 October 2026.

Published records, not allegations. An award shows who a public body chose to buy from, as it published; it is not a payment and says nothing about how the supplier was chosen beyond what the notice states.